New Voters Project 2006 Results
2006-11-14
Executive Summary
2006 New Voters Project
The Student PIRGs’ New Voters
Project teamed up with the Center for Information and Research on Civic
Learning and Engagement to measure the impacts of the Student PIRGs’ voter
turnout work in five states: Ohio, Connecticut, Iowa, Colorado and Michigan
(work in MI conducted by Michigan Votes)
The 2005 analysis focused on 36 precincts
with a relatively high concentration of college students that were the focus of
non-partisan Get-Out-the-Vote efforts of the Student PIRGs’ New Voters
Project.
The analysis compared each
precinct’s 2002 and 2006 voter turnout numbers and found that voter turnout
increased by an average of 156.94%.
Tables detailing the analysis is below.
This
increase is six times the national average increase of ballots cast by youth
adults (25%,
according to an exit poll analysis conducted by CIRCLE).
Turnout in
several of the precincts studied increased between three to five times.
For example, turnout at Precinct 103 at the University
of Colorado–Boulder increased
threefold, while turnout at Precinct 1 at the University of Connecticut
increased fivefold.
There were
several election results that came in after the study was completed that
confirm this study’s conclusion. For
example, all thirteen student-heavy wards at the University of Wisconsin
Madison posted increases, with turnout at three
wards (42, 46, 60) doubling.
Table 1: Analysis of
Targeted Precincts
|
State
|
University
|
Precinct #
|
County
|
Total
number of votes cast in 2002
|
Total
number of votes cast in 2006
|
Percent
increase over 2002
|
|
CO
|
UNC
|
315 &
329 (used to be one precinct in 2002)
|
Weld
|
244
|
587
|
140.57%
|
|
CO
|
University of Colorado
Boulder
|
102
|
Boulder
|
169
|
470
|
178.11%
|
|
CO
|
University of Colorado
Boulder
|
103
|
Boulder
|
72
|
240
|
233.33%
|
|
CO
|
University of Colorado
Boulder
|
118
|
Boulder
|
51
|
280
|
449.02%
|
|
CT
|
University of Connectticut
|
1
|
Mansfield
|
129
|
902
|
599.22%
|
|
Iowa
|
Iowa State U
|
Ames 2-2
|
Story
|
374
|
390
|
4.28%
|
|
Iowa
|
Iowa State U
|
Ames 4-3
|
Story
|
260
|
310
|
19.23%
|
|
Iowa
|
Iowa State U
|
Ames 4-4
|
Story
|
237
|
209
|
-11.81%
|
|
Ohio
|
Ohio State
U
|
16A
|
Franklin
|
207
|
296
|
43.00%
|
|
Ohio
|
Ohio State
U
|
16B
|
Franklin
|
252
|
287
|
13.89%
|
|
Ohio
|
Ohio State
U
|
39A
|
Franklin
|
180
|
379
|
110.56%
|
|
Ohio
|
Ohio State
U
|
40B
|
Franklin
|
175
|
327
|
86.86%
|
|
Ohio
|
Ohio State
U
|
41A
|
Franklin
|
103
|
176
|
70.87%
|
|
Ohio
|
Ohio State
U
|
41B
|
Franklin
|
182
|
286
|
57.14%
|
|
Ohio
|
Ohio State
U
|
41C
|
Franklin
|
89
|
173
|
94.38%
|
|
Ohio
|
Ohio State
U
|
41D
|
Franklin
|
104
|
110
|
5.77%
|
|
Ohio
|
Ohio State
U
|
41E
|
Franklin
|
110
|
218
|
98.18%
|
|
Ohio
|
Ohio State
U
|
16C
|
Franklin
|
197
|
305
|
54.82%
|
|
Ohio
|
Ohio State
U
|
16D
|
Franklin
|
141
|
150
|
6.38%
|
|
Ohio
|
Ohio State
U
|
16E
|
Franklin
|
133
|
142
|
6.77%
|
|
Ohio
|
Ohio State
U
|
18A
|
Franklin
|
316
|
392
|
24.05%
|
|
Ohio
|
Ohio State
U
|
18C
|
Franklin
|
379
|
671
|
77.04%
|
|
MI
|
University of Michigan
|
2-2
|
University of Michigan
|
364
|
761
|
109.07%
|
|
MI
|
University of Michigan
|
1-7
|
University of Michigan
|
230
|
604
|
162.61%
|
|
MI
|
University of Michigan
|
4-1
|
University of Michigan
|
241
|
550
|
128.22%
|
|
MI
|
University of Michigan
|
1-1
|
University of Michigan
|
267
|
513
|
92.13%
|
|
MI
|
University of Michigan
|
3-1
|
University of Michigan
|
310
|
511
|
64.84%
|
|
MI
|
University of Michigan
|
1-2
|
University of Michigan
|
129
|
306
|
137.21%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
Percent Increase
|
156.94%
|
*Turnout data provided by the Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement’s
tabulations and analysis of raw precinct data, November 2006.
|