CoPIRG Standing Up To Powerful Interests

Healthy Communities News

SearchRSS Feed

For Immediate Release:
08/01/2007
For More Information:
Kirpal Singh
(303) 573-7474 ext. 302

Technologies can Eliminate Chemical Hazards

DENVER—The July 20 explosion that occurred at the Carter Lake water treatment facility could have been prevented if safer technologies for treating water were employed according to Colorado Public Interest Research Group (CoPIRG) Staff Attorney, Kirpal Singh.

“We’ve moved chlorine gas, a chemical weapon, off the battlefield and into our communities,” said Mr. Singh. “Fortunately, there are safer technologies available that water treatment facilities can use to replace the extremely hazardous chemicals used to treat water.”

More than 200 water treatment facilities (including Washington, D.C.) converted to safer alternatives such as ultraviolet light, eliminating the use of chlorine and sulfur dioxide gas. In Colorado, there are two facilities that illustrate the danger of chlorine to the public. They also are good examples of sound corporate and governmental responses to the very real threat that chlorine gas presents to the public. These two examples are:

1) KIK Corporation- Manufactures bleach using chlorine gas. The facility currently has a vulnerability zone of more than 1 million people, but is in the process of adopting a just-in-time production process that would eliminate the storage of chlorine gas. Instead the gas would be produced when needed and not stored in 90 ton tanks. They have a website that talks about the process at www.k2pure.com (see also attached letter from KIK to Rep. Markey (D-Mass)).

2) Metro Reclamation District- wastewater treatment plant uses chlorine gas to purify wastewater. The storage and use of chlorine gas places 925,000 people at risk of exposure. The wastewater treatment plant also has plans to adopt safer technologies and will be switching to liquid bleach disinfection by the end of 2007. This switch would completely eliminate the vulnerability zone for this facility.

Nationally, pulp and paper mills that use chlorine or chlorine dioxide to whiten paper needlessly endanger more than 5.7 million people, according to a new report released today by CoPIRG.

The report, Pulp Fiction, identified 74 pulp and paper mills that endanger more than 5.7 million people by using chlorine or chlorine dioxide to bleach paper. If released, these two hazardous substances have the potential to kill or seriously injure even at relatively low concentrations.

According to CoPIRG’s research, bleaching technologies that do not use chlorine or chlorine dioxide are widely available. For example, the totally chlorine-free (TCF) technology whitens paper by using safer substances such as hydrogen peroxide or ozone instead of chlorine. These safer technologies can eliminate or significantly reduce the consequences of a chemical release.

Accidents at chemical facilities have long threatened communities and workers. The realization that a terrorist could use an industrial facility as a make-shift chemical weapon has amplified concerns about extremely hazardous chemicals like chlorine and chlorine dioxide.

Based on these concerns, the National Research Council recently identified safer technologies as the most desirable solution to address chemical plant security. The Council stated that the most effective way to prevent chemical releases is to eliminate the hazard where possible.

“Today’s report demonstrates that safer technologies are a reality,” said Mr. Singh. “Some facilities have already reduced chemical hazards by switching to safer technologies, but many others are continuing with business as usual. To truly make our communities safe, chemical facilities must adopt safer technologies.”

Last summer, the House Homeland Security Committee passed a chemical security bill that incorporated safer technologies, but this bill was never brought to the House floor for a vote. Comparable legislation will likely be introduced again this year.

“We call on Representatives Perlmutter and DeGette to ensure that safer technologies are a part of any serious chemical security proposal.”

SEARCH THIS SITE